Columns

Capitol Commentary: Halting Regulation on Emissions

March 10th, 2010 · 3 Comments

Last week I joined with my West Virginia colleagues Rep. Nick Rahall and Rep. Alan Mollohan in introducing legislation to suspend for two years action by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. A companion measure has been introduced in the U.S. Senate by Jay Rockefeller (D-WV).

Following the decision by the U.S. Supreme Court that greenhouse gases are a pollutant, the Environmental Protection Agency is now legally compelled to regulate greenhouse gases under the existing Clean Air Act. That law is not well-suited for such action since it disables EPA from taking into account the unique needs of the coal industry and electric utilities that burn coal. EPA regulation of greenhouse gases would be the worst outcome for the coal industry and our region’s coal related jobs.

The measure I have introduced will prevent the EPA from enacting or promulgating regulations on greenhouse gas emissions from stationary sources for two years, providing Congress time to approve a thoughtful regulatory program. In June, the U.S. House of Representatives approved a balanced measure which will control greenhouse gas emissions while preventing economic disruption.

While this measure is far from perfect, I was able to secure a number of important changes to the bill which allow for the continued and robust use of coal and the deployment of carbon capture and storage technologies necessary for the coal industry’s future success. If EPA is allowed to regulate greenhouse gas emissions, economic considerations simply cannot be taken into account.

I secured changes to key provisions in the measure approved by the House that protect the coal industry by enabling utilities to continue using coal while greenhouse emissions are reduced. My amendments assure funding for carbon capture and storage technologies and enable utilities to keep burning coal while paying others to reduce emissions. Specifically my changes to the bill provide:
• Free allowances to emitters, keeping the program affordable and encouraging coal use.
• An assured $10 billion in funding for carbon separation and storage (CCS) technology development and an additional $150 billion to incent its use by coal burning utilities. These funds will ensure that the technologies are fully developed and available at commercial scale.
• Two billion tons of offset credits which enable utilities to keep burning coal while paying others to reduce emissions. This number is roughly equal to all the greenhouse gas emissions from coal use nationwide.
• Modifications to the performance standards that require new coal plants to meet certain CCS requirements. I have succeeded in changing those to ensure that new coal plants will not be required to use CCS technology before it is widely commercially available and affordable.

While these changes make critical improvements to the bill, I am continuing to work for further improvements as the bill moves through the legislative process. The measure introduced today would give Congress time to approve this balanced approach before EPA acts with costly regulations.

While some may prefer to halt EPA action permanently, the votes do not exist in the Senate or the House to remove all EPA regulatory authority. Our bill is a responsible, achievable approach which prevents the EPA from enacting regulations that would harm coal and gives Congress time to establish a balanced program.

Congressman Rick BoucherRick Boucher is Congressman for the 9th District of Virginia, which includes the New River Valley. You can catch his Capitol Commentary regularly at newrivervoice.com.

3 responses so far ↓

  • 1 Gnarly // Mar 12, 2010 at 7:22 pm

    Sounds like you’d KO the EPA if possible.
    Would you?

  • 2 NRV Admin // Mar 13, 2010 at 10:53 am

    Editorial today (3/13) from the New York Times on this topic: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/13/opinion/13sat2.html

  • 3 Thomas Lansing // Mar 15, 2010 at 10:59 pm

    I don’t know about relaxing the EPA regulations, but something’s gotta give! Here we live in a region of the country where coal is produced, where our source of energy is literally in our own back yards, yet our local power bills continue to rise at a phenomenal rate. Fourteen (14) rate increase requests in the last 2 years alone!!!!!!!

    Not only are the power companies making sure they turn a profit – every tax, every regulation placed on them which is financially enforced (cap and trade) is or will be passed on to us, the consumers.

    I personally have switched to low watt bulbs, I have had new insulation put in my home, I only buy energy star appliances, I have done pretty much everything to lower my own use and impact, yet I still dread that power bill in the mail each month.

    We’ve all been hearing about government waste from the recent stimulus bill over the last few weeks. Instead of funding research into how rats get drunk, or repaving already new roads – why not use some of this federal stimulus money to upgrade power plants so they are less polluting, rather than forcing AP to take it out of our pockets with little to show in return?

Leave a Comment