Columns

Voiceover: Pondering Socialized Medicine

August 25th, 2009 · 2 Comments

In my head I keep hearing the voice of a woman from last week’s town hall meeting on health care held by Rep. Rick Boucher. In response to a public option for health insurance, this woman asked the question, “How can I trust the government?”

It’s a legitimate question. Our government, over the course of roughly 233 years, has given its citizens lots of reasons to distrust it. Obviously many of the folks—some of them quite angry—gathered in Edwards Hall at New River Community College in Dublin think the government is not to be trusted in the health care business.

They scoffed at Boucher for saying he didn’t think the public option being debated was, in fact, socialized medicine. I heard loud boos from the crowd when Boucher mentioned a move toward electronic medical files (presumably because people don’t trust the government?). So when I hear a woman’s voice ask how she can trust the government, and much of the crowd applauds wildly, I have to pause for a moment to wrap my head around this issue.

This is a card currently e-vailable at someecards.comAnd I come up with the question, would socialized medicine really be that bad?

I do have trouble trusting the government. But I also have trouble—probably more so—trusting  insurance companies. I’ve had good and bad experiences with insurance companies. When my wife (at the time) was pregnant and had numerous complications all along the way, Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Alabama was fantastic and I am still extremely thankful for the service we received. Without it, I might not have a healthy and intelligent 9-year-old daughter.

But just a few months after that, I changed jobs and moved to Washington State, where my experiences with Aetna were horrendous. I swear their philosophy was to frustrate the customer so much and cause such a hassle that the customer eventually would just give up on their rightful claim. It worked with me more than once.

And as someone who is now self-employed, my current situation with health insurance is quite troubling as very few standard things are covered without me first paying a huge deductible. Basically, I can’t afford to get sick.

You can watch Michael Moore’s documentary Sicko or even shorter anecdotal video clips such those that you can see here or here or here or here or even here. No reasonable person can dispute that our current system of health care had innumerable flaws.

I saw people at Tuesday’s town hall meeting become infuriated at the thought of trusting our government to health care. But when the call comes up to fight tyranny and spread democracy in Iraq, I doubt most of those people grabbed up their guns (which I’m sure they own) and bought their own plane ticket to Baghdad to take up the fight. They instead depended on the U.S. Armed Forces, operated by the federal government. When they want to send a birthday card to Aunt Sue in Iowa, they don’t drive the card there themselves, they send it via the U.S. Postal Service, operated by the federal government.

I could go on and on with examples as there are hundreds of federal agencies out there designed to, in some way, help us lead better lives. Admittedly, they aren’t all as efficient as they should be and some have problems with corruption, but isn’t that true with insurance companies—or just about any corporation?

I think health care reform is needed. And quite frankly, I’m not sure what the best option is. I am disheartened, however, that a single-payer plan—or what those at last week’s town hall meeting would demonizingly call socialized medicine—is not really even getting mentioned in the debate. I’d at least like to see some smart and reasonable people offer the pros and cons of such a system.

But for now it seems that the “new liberals” at Fox News and other like-minded anti-reform folks are controlling the debate with massive amounts of propaganda and talk of fictional items such as death panels.

I’m not sure what the answers are to health care reform, but I’d like to hear clear, concise, and honest debate on the issue, and that seems difficult to find these days.

So what are your thoughts on health care reform? We want to know your opinion! Write your comments below!

Tim W. Jackson is Editor of the New River Voice.

2 responses so far ↓

  • 1 Cynthia // Aug 26, 2009 at 8:14 am

    Thank you for your coverage this summer, Tim. I can always trust you to address what is important to me. I echo your insurance sentiments. Why do insurance companies get to dictate what they are willing to pay? Where else in our economy is this bartering allowed outside of individual exchange? Why is a for profit organization allowed to govern our medical lives? I have been properly groomed as an American to revere and hold in esteem capitalism and for-profit enterprise but since my youth I have resisted my training. Many things in life should not be treated as commodities and that includes most health care. The entire enterprise of perfection (breast enhancement, plastic surgery for improved beauty) is another matter. Additionally, all the things that people seem most unhappy about such as rationing care and government run health care are already extant. My for- profit insurance company decides what they will pay for and how much they will pay for necessary medical procedures. I believe they limit my care so that their investors will see a monetary return. Medicaid and Medicare are government run programs. If it’s not a system that meets most people’s needs most of the time then why are so many people worried about losing it?
    Dictionary.com defines socialism as “a theory or system of social organization that advocates the vesting of the ownership and control of the means of production and distribution, of capital, land, etc., in the community as a whole.” Its ways of organizing resonate for me and were we to examine our lives we might find many ways in which we are already constructed in this way including national parks and museums and a federal highway system.

  • 2 Sara // Aug 26, 2009 at 8:35 am

    It’s so nice to see someone not jumping to conclusions on this for a change. My head hurts from listening to this debate over the last few months. Personally, I can’t help but think that those who are so vehemently opposed to a public option have never had to pay for COBRA, or worse, have never had to pay for medical care without the benefit of any insurance. Over the course of 9 months last year, my wife and I dropped over $7,000 for health care coverage for her. We paid $500 a month to COBRA for the privilege to spend an additional $300 on medicine. My wife is diabetic. It runs in her family and despite being in good health otherwise, her body doesn’t produce insulin, so she has to have a prescription for it. If she didn’t, she’d die. So for us, it was pay crazy expensive amounts for COBRA, or watch her die. The choice was obvious. We just wish there had been another option between the extremes. I don’t know that a public option is the answer, but honestly, anything is better than the deadlocked mind-numbing, slightly terrifying debates going on in this country right now. I wish that these people who rant and scream about Obama being a Nazi and how he’s trying to turn us into a Socialist county would put themselves in the shoes of the people who are dying for this debate to end. Literally. Tim, thanks for a thoughtful look on a subject that has turned into such a three-ring circus in the mass media.

Leave a Comment